| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jemvie
Joined: 18 Apr 2005 Posts: 1 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 4:21 pm Post subject: Best Rach #3 Performance/Recording? |
|
|
Hi!
1-First of all the Rach #3 is the best piano concert I have ever heard.
2-Rachmaninoff is my favorite pianist
3-I'd like to know what is/are the best recording and performance of the piano concert #3 a Rachmaninoff fan must own.
4-I currently only have Kissin's Rachmaninoff rach #3 with the Boston Symphony Orchesrta directed by Ozawa released in 1993 under the RCA label, which I was told by the guy at the store was his personal favorite. I like it a lot both in sound quality(DDD) and performance but I'd like to know if I'm missing something good.
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RACHBOY
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 193 Location: Holland
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've met mr Ashkenazy (just check the video of him in the Members section) He is a very kind, caring and interesting man.I unfortunately have seen him conduct and not play the piano. I love his recording of the Symphonic Dances with the Concertgebouw Orchestra! _________________ Rachboy [moderator] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
studdman
Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 8:33 pm Post subject: Best Rach 3 |
|
|
| I would strongly agree that Ashkenazy's recording of the Rach 3 is the very best! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RACHBOY
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 193 Location: Holland
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Djusz, thanks for your favorite 3rd Piano Concerto list. Could you please expand on whey these are your favorites, so we can discuss the recordings in more detail?
| Djusz wrote: | I'm terribly sorry I have to disagree with all of you. I'm a student at the Brussles Conservatory, Rachmaninoff is my favorite composer and the "rach 3" happens to be my favorite concerto. And I think I've heard pretty much every recording there has ever been of it and here's my rank.
1. Nicolai Lugansky with Ivan Sphiller (Russian State Orchestra)
2. Horowitz and Zubin Mehta
3 Evgeny Moguilevsky (1964 recording)
4. Pletnev
After that, there aren't many good recordings. I'm sorry Mr. Ashkenasy you play Rachmaninov very well but I didn't like your interpretation of the 3rd concerto. |
_________________ Rachboy [moderator] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sasha
Joined: 29 Aug 2005 Posts: 167 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very very educational!
I've got to get those CDs you guys are talking about.
I just realized that one of Rach3 I have is played by Ashkenazy.
How about the guy who played for the move "Shine" I don't remeber his name... Martin or Mark something. What do you guys think of him?
Thanks  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RACHBOY
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 193 Location: Holland
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Djusz,
thanks very much for your reply! It is very difficult selecting favorites, mostly I like one movement from one performer best idem second and third movement from yet another pianist. That is the case with for instance Tzimon Barto, Feltsman, Volodos. But for total performances I like Lugansky a lot (but more with the solo works) but I do not think he is amongst my all time favorites in the 3rd concerto.
Top for me are: Rachmaninoff's own recording (of course) because it gives me a total different and authentic feel to the concerto that no-one after that has ever given me. special Tempi (beginning!), emotional content, introspective elements and virtuoso piano playing without being "showy" (cadenza 1st movement!). super!
Furthermore Horowitz with Albert Coates is still a version where heart starts running faster. Explanation: Horowitz always makes me feel he want to go somewhere in a hurry and that combined with the historical significance of the recording and superb piano playing does it for me every time.
In a special bracket for me is Gieseking's recording (1939). He does amazing things here (and makes amazing mistakes as well) but tries to put emotion and takes risks in every single bar which I admire and adore very much which he combines with excellent long musical lines. He goes through the 1st movement cadenza like a madman in a good sense of the word. And listen how he starts the 1st movement extremely slowly and then picks up the tempo without you noticing,amazing!
more later....
Do you know if Moguilevsky's version is out on cd? I've heard it on LP and it was superb!
| Djusz wrote: | | Well, my dear rachboy, first I'll have to ask you if you ever heard the Lugansky interpretation. Just listen to the first notes, he puts a certain rythmic aspect to that first melody, which no one else does. And the Cadenza is so perfect I just don't have words for it. And the Finale is just amazing. I'm sorry, I'm not very good with explaining why he's the best, he just is. If I had to play the 3rd concerto, I'd be affraid to ruin it in comparison to Lugansky. I don't know if you know of this recording, if you don't have it, I can just send it to you by email or something, you just ask. Then Horowitz, well...Horowitz is off course a far better pianist than Lugansky in overall, but Lugansky is just unbeatable when it comes to rachmaninoff. This is probably the most famous recording of all times though (horowitz-mehta), and I think that probably justifies it's position in the top three. Then, Moguilevsky, it's very hard to find this recording these days. Moguilevsky won the Queen elisabeth contest in 1964 with the rach3, it's very special in it's own way: you can easily detect the same russian technique Horowitz uses, but it's quite different anyway (I have this one too if you want it). Then finally, Pletnev. Well, pletnev is the rachmaninoff of our time. I mean, he's a pianist (probably the best one alive), a very good conductor, and one of the last post-romantic composers, he almost impersefies Rachmaninoff, so it's logical that his version is a very good one. So, I hope you're happy with my explenation. Which recording is the best according to you? |
_________________ Rachboy [moderator] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rachmaninoff fan
Joined: 25 Sep 2005 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: |
Horowitz: the earlier recordings are they best. in both the Coates recording and the live (Barbarolli) recording, his playing is unaffected and justify his reputation in this piece. dislike the Reiner recording, as his playing is more affected by then and the recording was v unbalanced. he was undoubtedly one of the great pianists of the 20th century but I am not convinced that he was a comparable musician.
|
I got a recording of horowitz playing the rachmaninoff 3 on video but when you are looking en hearing good you can see and heare very much folds in the peace
horowitz is/was very good but I think he still need(ed) to study on the rachmaninoff 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amphissa
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 65 Location: Mount Parnassus
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rachboy, the Mogilevsky recording of the 3rd piano concerto is available on CD. Melodiya label. MEL CD 10 00656
I you do not have a local source, you can purchase from RussianDVD online here not allowedrussiandvd.com/store/product.asp?sku=37363&genreid= _________________ "Life without music is a mistake." Nietzsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
morakeo
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 222 Location: Athens, Greece
|
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The guy from the movie (not the actor but the real pianist) is David Helfgott. Well, his interpretations generally and not only on Rachmaninoff's works (Liszt, Chopin, Mendelssohn) are always pure and true of a person in this world that lives because of and for music. He's not that bad as people say. Of course Rachmaninoff and Horowitz are the Men of the 3rd Concerto. Horowitz played it differently than Rachmaninoff but the composer always admired his interpretation. I agree about Ashkenazy not having Rachmaninoff in him but he's not that bad either. What I believe about these more recent russian pianists, and generally, musicians is that Rachmaninoff, Schostakowitsch, Horowitz, Sofronitsky, Mravinsky etc. were musicians that lived the pre-1917 Russian conditions and the after-1917 Russian conditions and were not babies during this year, so they remember and can express this. Living a situation is something that can never be exactly described to someone who hasn't lived it. Mravinsky's Schostakowitsch's 5th, or 8th or 12th will always be the top ones. Both composer and conductor lived these two different environments. So when you hear Bernstein conducting the Schostakowitsch 5th and hear Mravinsky you think its 2 totally different pieces. Or when you hear Horowitz on Mussorgsky's "Pictures at an Exhibition" and Richter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Romain
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 5 Location: Lyon
|
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
In my opinion...
in the category "old sound", the greatest 3rd concertos players are :
Rachmaninov
Horowitz/koussevitzky
Guilels/Svetlanov
Guilels/Cluytens
...with a slight preference for Guilels/Svetlanov.
More recently, I like above all :
Ashkenazy/Previn
Volodos
Argerich
The rhapsodic style of Argerich may not be liked, however I am always deeply impressed by her playing, which for me cannot be compared to any other one. To be frank, in such a virtuoso concerto I think she as a point.
N.B. I don't like much both Lugansky's recordings of this concerto, because he is not very committed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Black_N°_1
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 9 Location: Ghent, Belgium
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think one of the best recordings is those with Nikolsky during the Queen Elisabeth contest in 1987, followed by Horowitz' ones.
It's a disaster Nikolsky died in a car-crash in Brussels. He could have been one of the greatest Rachmaninov-performers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RACHBOY
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 193 Location: Holland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting, I like Nikolsky, is that recording still available?
| Black_N°_1 wrote: | I think one of the best recordings is those with Nikolsky during the Queen Elisabeth contest in 1987, followed by Horowitz' ones.
It's a disaster Nikolsky died in a car-crash in Brussels. He could have been one of the greatest Rachmaninov-performers. |
_________________ Rachboy [moderator] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Black_N°_1
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 9 Location: Ghent, Belgium
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| RACHBOY wrote: | Interesting, I like Nikolsky, is that recording still available?
| Black_N°_1 wrote: | I think one of the best recordings is those with Nikolsky during the Queen Elisabeth contest in 1987, followed by Horowitz' ones.
It's a disaster Nikolsky died in a car-crash in Brussels. He could have been one of the greatest Rachmaninov-performers. |
|
It was a limited edition. I'm afraid it isn't still available. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daniel Baker
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Djusz wrote: |
1. Nicolai Lugansky with Ivan Sphiller (Russian State Orchestra)
2. Horowitz and Zubin Mehta
3 Evgeny Moguilevsky (1964 recording)
4. Pletnev
After that, there aren't many good recordings. I'm sorry Mr. Ashkenasy you play Rachmaninov very well but I didn't like your interpretation of the 3rd concerto. |
I agree. After hearing some recordings of Rachmaninoff's concerto's by Mr. Ashkenazy, they are quite good. I really like the 1st and 2nd piano concertos, and as far as those go, I prefer the recording of Krystian Zimerman. He has a very clean and percussive approach to the piano.
I have heard Rachmaninoff's recording of the 3rd piano concerto and I really like it. What do you think of that? Thank you.
Where might these recordings of Nicolai Lugansky and Horowitz be available? I live in the United States, not in Russia. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daniel Baker
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| As far as I have heard, I enjoy Rachmaninoff's own recording the best, and I really enjoy Ashkenazy's recording. It's his best piano concerto recording. Horowitz's style is very unique and it's a nice contrast to the others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|